Dimensional Man
Is it so difficult to tell the truth? Is it beyond us to look and see, then to trace the form of representation as it draws us to acceptance as experience? Is attraction not its own experience? Is representation conditional, consisting of both attraction and repulsion? Is representation a function of acceptance, or a precursor to the urge to amend existence? Is the seen thing possessed or witnessed?
In a single instant a man can discover the meaning of life.
Life is revealed in a million happenings, all at once, any one of which will tell the truth about the same honest thing – life. Whether a person accepts life, through the limited senses of perception, does not materially alter life. Lack of acceptance by man only alters man, who must be contorted by lack thereby.
Man’s love is fed by acceptance, even under conditions of material lack. Man’s distortion is fed by lack of acceptance, even in times of plenty. Curses attend the oppositional impulse.
Dark and light were never and never will be exclusive. They are co-existing states. Neither requires the choice of one over the other. It is we who erroneously mandate such preferences, which are not based on equanimity, but on fear, or malformed perception.
>>
What then drives a man to renounce love? To renounce his love of truth destroys the heart and soul, but still a man will do it. Love and acceptance are intertwined forms, as life and death are. The urge to possess and cause is a human failing, but one that is instructional, and a boon to drama.
>>>
Even when he has renounced fact for illusion, and made his mind into God, man will cry and tear at his bonds and look for someone or something to blame. Man has nothing and no one to blame.
>>>>
Not one sad thing can replace love.
Freedom will always cleave to the truthful work.
It is not untrue to point at trans-movement in nature and claim that all things are affected by encounters here. Light and water prove this.
